Knowledge and Factive Attitudes
Suppose that being amazed that p, being relieved that p, and being happy that p are factive attitudes. Does having such attitudes require one to know that p? Williamson, in the first chapter of Knowledge and Its Limits, argues that the answer is “Yes”. The oddity of the following sentences provides support for his view:
- Sue doesn’t know that you’re a great singer, but she is amazed that you’re one.
- Xuxa is relieved that her son has arrived safely, but she doesn’t know that he has; for all she knows, he died in the war, and people are just trying to keep her away from the awful news.
- They were happy to have found a barn for shelter, but they didn’t know, although they truly believed, that it was a barn; after all, they couldn’t rule out the possibility that it was a barn facade.
One upshot of Williamson’s view is that if some sort of global scepticism is right, then not only is there little that we know about—there’s little that we can be said to be happy about, or amazed about, or relieved about. (The oddity of the above sentences remains if we replace “Sue is amazed that you’re a great singer” with “Sue is amazed about your being a great singer”, “Xuxa is relieved that her son has arrived safely” with “Xuxa is relieved about her son’s safe arrival”, etc.)
Another upshot is that if “knows that p” is context-sensitive, then (perhaps derivatively) so are terms like “happy that p”, “amazed that p”, and “relieved that p”. (Since happiness, amazement, and relief come in degrees, it might be a matter of context how much happiness, for example, is needed for one to be said to be happy. But this is not the kind of context-sensitivity that I’m concerned with here.) Suppose that we start off in a context in which it is correct to say both that Sue knows that you sing well, and also that she is amazed that you sing well. But suppose that standards go up, and we find ourselves in a new context in which it is no longer correct to say the former. Then it is no longer correct to say the latter. If contextualism about knowledge attributions is right, then it seems that whether you can be said to be happy, or amazed, or relieved about something, depends on the epistemic standards operating in the contexts in which such things are said. (And a similar story could be told if subject-sensitive invariantism is correct. If whether one knows that p is subjective-sensitive, then so is whether one is happy that p, or amazed that p, or relieved that p.)
Someone who subscribes to Williamson’s view, but who, unlike Williamson, is either a global sceptic or a contextualist, might well embrace such consequences of the view. The global sceptic isn’t committed to saying, on Williamson’s view, that there’s a dearth of happiness, amazement, or relief in the world, even though she has to say that there’s little that one can be happy, amazed, or relieved about. The contextualist can maintain that in ordinary contexts, one can be said to be happy, amazed, or relieved about lots of things; it’s only in extraordinary contexts that there’s little that one can be said to be happy, amazed, or relieved about.
Now I suppose that if the global sceptic doesn’t find her view that we know very little discomfitting, she would have no qualms holding that there’s little we can be happy, amazed, or relieved about. But what about the contextualist? I find it strange that whether Xuxa can be said to be happy that her son has arrived safely varies with context, such that in one context, we can say that she is happy that her son has arrived safely, but in some other context, we can’t, even though in both contexts, her subjective feeling of happiness, her degree of confidence in her son’s safe arrival, and her justification for thinking that her son has arrived safely, are the same. Perhaps, this won’t seem so strange to me if in both contexts, there is something common that we can say that Xuxa is happy about. But what is it? Of course, in both contexts, we can say that Xuxa is happy in her belief that her son has arrived safely, but it’s not her belief that she’s happy about.
Perhaps, the lesson to draw is as follows. Stalnaker (Inquiry, Ch. 4) and Lewis think that questions about the content of belief and questions about our practice of belief attributions should be separated. Perhaps, questions about the content of happiness and questions about our practice of happiness attributions should likewise be separated. Xuxa is happy, and the content of her happiness seems to be just this: her son’s safe arrival. Whether we can say that she’s happy that he has arrived safely might depend on other things. If Xuxa’s son actually died in the war, but she mistakenly thinks that he has arrived safely, and therefore feels happy, it won’t be correct to say that she’s happy that he has arrived safely. But this doesn’t change that fact that she feels happy, and that the content of her happiness is about her son’s safe arrival.
May 25th, 2008 at 1:50 pm
I think I agree with your diagnosis of this phenomenon, but I’m not sure if a good enough case can be made for it. The statement:
(H) I am happy that the cat is on the mat, even though I don’t know that it is.
sounds like the Moorean paradox:
(M) the cat is on the mat, but I don’t know that it is.
So if it’s just the same phenomenon, then the diagnosis you offer is obviously perfect. It can be true that you’re happy that p without you knowing that p, but it would be inappropriate to assert this. Unfortunately, the two sentences are not structurally equivalent. Consider what happens when we imbed them into a “suppose that…” clause:
Suppose that the cat is on the mat, but I don’t know that it is
Suppose that I am happy that the cat is on the mat, but I don’t know that it is
The first sentence, which is the imbedded version of M, sounds perfectly fine. The second sentence however, sounds just as bad as its unimbedded counterpart H. Furthermore, if H is perfectly consistent, but unassertable, why does it still sound wrong when we’re merely being asked to suppose that it is true? One reason for thinking that M is *merely* unassertable, but perfectly consistent is precisely that we can conceive of a situation in which it is true. Yalcin makes the same point about statements like:
(P) The cat is on the mat, but it is possible that it isn’t.
If “it is possible that p” simply means “my epistemic situation is consistent with p” then (P) ought to sound okay under the ’suppose that…’ imbedding, but it doesn’t. Perhaps the consistency, but unassertability of such statements can be explained in some other way, but at the moment I have no idea how such a story might go.
May 27th, 2008 at 2:33 pm
I think there’s a widespread use of ‘know’ in English on which it means the same as ‘truly believe’. This might explain the oddity of ’she doesn’t know that p, but she is happy that p’. To be happy that p you have to truly believe that p. In the barn case, I don’t feel a real tension between the happiness and the lack of substantial knowledge.
June 29th, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Sorry for the terribly late replies, Leon and wo…
I wasn’t being very clear, but I don’t want to say that
(H) I am happy that the cat is on the mat, even though I don’t know that it is.
although consistent, isn’t assertable. Maybe (H) is inconsistent. Maybe the truth of the sentence, `I know that the cat is on the mat’, is necessary for the truth of the sentence, `I’m happy that the cat is on the mat’. But the point is that while this might be how `I’m happy that…’ sentences work, the issue of what one is happy about is a different one. Suppose I don’t know that the cat is on the mat. There might still be something that I’m happy about, and the content of such happiness might well be the cat being on the mat, even if the sentence `I’m happy that the cat is on the mat’ is literally false. Cf. Stalnaker, who thinks that the content of our beliefs cannot include the impossible. Still, it might be right to say things like, `She believes that Fermat’s Last Theorem is false’. The lesson to draw, if Stalnaker is right, is that we should keep separate the issue of the content of our beliefs, and the issue of how we use “She believes that…’ sentences. (OK, I hope I didn’t make things more confusing… )
wo, I agree that in the barn case, there is less of a tension than in other cases with saying that one is happy that p, but doesn’t know it. I was willing to grant Williamson’s intuition so as to see where that would lead us.
February 16th, 2010 at 5:38 pm
Hi what entice you to location an document? This document was highly interesting, especially because I was searching for thoughts on this topic last Thursday.
April 21st, 2010 at 10:15 am
Your publishis an inspiration for me to learnmore about this topic. I must concede your lucidity widened my views and I will forthwith snatch your rss feed to remain up to date on any incoming articles you might issue.
April 24th, 2010 at 9:17 am
Appreciate your article. It was well said.
May 11th, 2010 at 7:11 am
hey, your post actually assists, today i encounter the same problems, and i have no clue on how to solve the issue. luckily i look yahoo and found your post, it helps me get rid of my trouble. thanks once morejust one thing, can i paste your entry on my blog? i will add the source and credit to your site.regards!
May 14th, 2010 at 11:30 am
Many thanks for the well-thought report. My wife’s calling me for dinner So I have to go off without reading all I’d like. However, I put your blog on my RSS feed so that I can examine far more.
May 15th, 2010 at 11:26 pm
Very useful informations about these subject. I have found them with googling and you seems number one of these subjects ! . . .
May 18th, 2010 at 12:00 am
Advantageously, the article is actually the greatest topic on curing acne naturally. I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your coming updates. Saying thanks will not just be enough, for the phenomenal lucidity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay informed of any updates.
May 18th, 2010 at 12:29 am
Hold yourself responsible for a higher standard than anyone else expects of you. Never excuse yourself. Thank You. . . .
May 18th, 2010 at 12:30 am
Cool post! How much stuff did you have to look up in order to write this one? I can tell you put some work in.
May 18th, 2010 at 3:31 am
Advantageously, the article is actually the greatest topic on curing acne naturally. I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your coming updates. Saying thanks will not just be enough, for the phenomenal lucidity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay informed of any updates.
May 18th, 2010 at 2:19 pm
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with extra information? It is extremely useful for me.
May 18th, 2010 at 3:56 pm
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon.
May 18th, 2010 at 5:08 pm
This is a really good read for me. Must admit that you are one of the coolest bloggers I ever saw. Thanks for posting this informative article.
May 19th, 2010 at 1:39 am
Hello… I can not access your rss feed… Something trouble? Can you fix it? Thanks
May 19th, 2010 at 5:32 pm
I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but it really compensated for my time. I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.
May 20th, 2010 at 12:16 am
Hey - nice blog, just looking around some blogs, seems a pretty nice platform you are using. I’m currently using Wordpress for a few of my sites but looking to change one of them over to a platform similar to yours as a trial run. Anything in particular you would recommend about it?
May 21st, 2010 at 7:04 pm
I really like your site and i really appreciate the excellent quality content you are posting here for free for your online readers. Can you tell us which blog platform you are using?
May 22nd, 2010 at 5:30 am
Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained! I’m sure you had fun writing this article.
May 22nd, 2010 at 7:00 pm
Nice to be visiting your blog again, it has been months for me. Well this article that i’ve been waited for so long. I need this article to complete my assignment in the college, and it has same topic with your article. Thanks, great share.
May 22nd, 2010 at 7:59 pm
That is very sublime stuff. Never new that beliefs could be this varied. Thanks for all the enthusiasm to extend such helpful information at this site.
May 22nd, 2010 at 8:57 pm
Hi vey nice interesting blog im from newcastel i found this on aol I’m in the crane hire company business,i found this blog very interesting good luck with it i will return to this blog soon
May 23rd, 2010 at 1:46 am
Resources like the one you mentioned here will be very useful to me! I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.
May 23rd, 2010 at 2:25 am
If you don’t mind me asking I just wanted to get the scoop on what is the difference between blogenenigne and wordpress blogs? Is it easier to use or more efficient? I amseeing a lot of blogs powered by this software popping up lately and wondering if it is better or not? Thanks…
May 23rd, 2010 at 6:13 am
I have been visiting variousblogs for my dissertation study. I have found your blog to be fairlybeneficial. Keep updating your blog with usefulinformation… Regards
May 24th, 2010 at 3:29 am
Thanks for taking this opportunity to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and I take pleasure in learning about this topic. If possible, as you gain information, please add to this blog with new information. I have found it extremely useful.
May 24th, 2010 at 4:43 pm
This is my second visit to this blog. We are starting a new initiative in the same niche as this blog. Your blog provided us with valuable information to work on. You have done a fantastic job.
May 24th, 2010 at 6:11 pm
Thank you for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbour were preparing to do some research about that. We got a good book on that matter from our local library and most books where not as influensive as your information.
May 25th, 2010 at 10:47 pm
Thank you for another fantastic blog. Where else could I get this kind of info written in such an incite full way? I have a presentation that I am just now working on, and I have been looking for such information.
May 28th, 2010 at 4:51 am
I was just browsing for relevant blog posts for my project research and I happened to stumble upon yours. Thanks for the useful information!
May 28th, 2010 at 5:47 am
I completely agree with the above comment, the internet is with a doubt growing into the most important medium of communication across the globe and its due to sites like this that ideas are spreading so quickly.
May 28th, 2010 at 7:31 pm
Thank you for such a fantastic blog. Where else could anyone get that kind of info written in such a perfect way? I have a presentation that I am presently working on, and I have been on the look out for such information.
May 29th, 2010 at 4:53 am
Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained! I’m sure you had fun writing this article.
May 31st, 2010 at 1:27 pm
Hey - nice blog, just looking around some blogs, seems a pretty nice platform you are using. I’m currently using Wordpress for a few of my sites but looking to change one of them over to a platform similar to yours as a trial run. Anything in particular you would recommend about it?
May 31st, 2010 at 5:27 pm
Hello,I love reading through your blog, I wanted to leave a little comment to support you and wish you a good continuation. Wishing you the best of luck for all your blogging efforts.
June 3rd, 2010 at 12:00 am
Thank you for such a fantastic blog. Where else could one get this kind of info written in such an incite full way? I have a presentation that I am just now working on, and I have been looking for such information.
June 3rd, 2010 at 4:47 am
Nice site, I just dugg this keep up the good work!. . . . . .
June 3rd, 2010 at 6:58 am
That is some inspirational stuff. Never knew that opinions could be this varied. Thanks for all the enthusiasm to offer such helpful information here.
June 3rd, 2010 at 2:47 pm
I do agree with all the ideas you have presented in your post. They are very convincing and will definitely work. Thanks for the post.